Saturday, 7 September 2013

Evolutionary not revolutionary?

This is rather deep, more so than usual! I’m no scientist, but just going on observation of technology with human intervention.

Humans exist to succeed, that's why we are here today, as the dominant species on Earth. But to get where we are now, our ancestors have taken many learning processes that have had major influences.  Technology is proof of our evolutionary existence. Humans have developed this over many years. It really is evolutionary not revolutionary. From our ancestors to now, we have learned and shared our knowledge throughout generations. This has given rise to new ideas and thought processes.  So it was only a matter of time before humans came up with the concept of advancing with technology.

Using technology in education is now modern learning and teaching. We are surrounded by it everywhere in day to day life. It’s going to be interesting to see where technology will be taken in the future.  Plus, how learning and teaching will evolve with it.  Will it become all automated or will it go back slightly traditional?

It’s funny that technology is our greatest invention and I think it will be our greatest killer, a killer both socially and in our work; jobs and careers. It seems to be replacing naturally given in-person communication, interactions and doing physical jobs. While this is good for some educational and work situations (which is what it should be used for, not a replacement), it does have a major impact on social and communication skills.  Or, will humans evolve alongside technology and our natural in-person social and communications will become secondary?  I think it has been proven to be happening now.  Technology needs to be used smartly and wisely.  I once said:


I love using technology, but it does come with some consequences.  I think humans will come full circle at some point. A benefit to Earth or not, it will be decided by the laws of nature as it always is.  As I've said many times, the end of world is humans imploding on themselves not just a dying planet.

EDIT: a new related blog post 'How is learning technology evolving?'.

EDIT:  August 2024.  A somewhat related conversation.  In one of mine and Gary's Sunday morning baths, where we tend to do deep dive conversations.  We talked about a video that I watched earlier that morning on the ancient rainforests of UK, mainly in Scotland.  In the video it mentioned about how the early formation of national parks were created through rulings of William the Conqueror.  Which led us to talking about our views of people owning land - which we don't agree with as that is how some people, often the 'born into the rich' due to stolen land from rural dwellers/Druids.  I also refer this to early adopter tactics where if someone is the first of creating/finding something and builds success around it.  Then depending on the type of person they are, they might ring fence it and establish inappropriate but potentially profitable means around it.  Gary later shared thoughts on how the generation before us will be better off than ours, e.g. pensions etc.  I said that life has become so complex, yes research and intelligence has increased and helped in many ways, but it causes more upheaval and I feel it is at the expense of our mental health, peace and freedom.  Perhaps Druids and other shamans had/have it right.  All this circles back to what I foresee in humans imploding on themselves due to the complexity and processes we've created - it's just not all sustainable and ethical and something is going to give, and that will be people's sanity.  In our lifetime I think we'll see a huge unrest movement, bigger than the riots we had recently.  Maybe this imploding will be linked to climate change and lack of food resources - we've seen how quickly that can change due to heat waves and flooding, and we can't fully rely on lab grown food.  Of which climate change can force people to move countries, and we know how this country (UK) has reacted and pre-empted with Brexit in preventing immigration here.  As we agreed, the worlds problems would be solved by the rich; sharing money to solve real-world problems - nobody needs that enormous amount of money, it should be capped. But greed and the desperation to be superior to others tends to win.  And these rich people are not always intelligent innovators they profess to be, but wealth passed down (born into the rich again) and business tactics.  I feel being in a bubble with close loved ones and contributing to society is best way forward for now.